Crucifixion was performed to dissuade those who witness it from perpetrating similar crimes. Victims were sometimes left on display after death as a warning to any other potential criminals. Crucifixion was usually intended to provide a death that was particularly slow, painful (hence the term excruciating, literally “out of crucifying”), gruesome, humiliating, and public, using whatever means were most expedient for that goal. Crucifixion methods varied considerably with location and time period.
The Greek and Latin words corresponding to “crucifixion” applied to many different forms of painful execution. These may be being impaled on a stake, upright pole (a crux simplex), or to a combination of an upright (stipes) and a crossbeam (patibulum) to give the traditional Latin cross (crux immissa). Other forms are; the St Andrews cross which is shaped like an “X” (crux decussata) and one shaped like the Greek letter tau or “T” (crux humilus)
So, what was the actual form of crucifixion that our Lord suffered. The Jehovah Witnesses say it was a simple pole which they call the Torture Stake as shown. To support their argument, they say that the Greek word stauros only means a stake. But Kittel’s Theological Dictionary states that it can mean any of three types; a pointed stake, an upright with a cross beam and a cross consisting of two intersecting beams of equal length.
Since the Jehovah witnesses are wrong in denying Christ’s Lordship are they wrong in this as well?
Evidence for the traditional cross
Evidence from the Bible
If Jesus was crucified on a pole as shown, only one nail would be required to affix His hands, but Thomas states nails:
Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my figure where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it.
Also, Matthew states: ..above his head they put the charge against him, which read, THIS IS JESUS KING OF THE JEWS. But if Jesus was crucified on a stake as shown, then the sign would have been placed directly above His hands and not above His head.
Roman playwright Plautus (254-184 BC) and Greek philosopher Plutarch (AD 46-120) refer in their writings to convicted criminals carrying their own patibulum (cross bar) to their places of crucifixion. Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 BC-AD 65) also known simply as Seneca, was a Roman Stoic philosopher and statesman. In his writings he refers to condemned men being forced to carry their own patibulum to the place of crucifixion. The carrying of the patibulum seems to have been common practise in biblical times and is consistent with Jesus being made to carry his patibulum as stated in John’s gospel. Again confirming that Jesus was crucified on what has become known as the traditional cross.
Evidence from outside the Bible
The Epistle of Barnabas is a Greek epistle written between 70–132 AD. It is preserved complete in the 4th century Codex Sinaiticus where it appears at the end of the New Testament. The epistle described how Jesus’ outstretched arms on the cross were similar to Moses’ outstretched arms in a battle with the Amalekites.
Apologist Justin Martyr (110-165) described Christ’s crucifixion as being similar to the roasting of a sacrificial lamb which is held by two sticks in the form of a cross; one lengthwise and one horizontal to which its legs are attached.
Irenaeus (140-202) who heard the preaching of Polycarp who in turn, heard from the apostle John, wrote concerning Christ’s cross; The very form of the cross, too, has five extremities, two in length, two in breadth, and one in the middle, on which [last] the person rests who is fixed by the nails. This describes a Latin cross.
The Alexamenos graffito (also known as the graffito blasfemo, or blasphemous graffito) is a piece of Roman graffiti scratched in plaster on the wall of a room near the Palatine Hill in Rome, which has now been removed and is in the Palatine Hill Museum. It may be the earliest surviving depiction of Jesus’ crucifixion, albeit a derogatory one. The image seems to show a young man worshipping a crucified, donkey-headed figure. The Greek inscription approximately translates to “Alexamenos worships [his] god,” indicating that the graffito was apparently meant to mock a Christian named Alexamenos. It clearly shows a cross with the victim’s arms outstretched.
It is hard to date, but has been estimated to have been made about AD 200.
Christians can be assured that the cross used for almost 2,000 years and which is so important to us, is the same type that our Lord was crucified on. It is the Jehovah’s Witnesses who are wrong as they are with the very nature and essence of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
 John 20:25.
 Matthew 27:37.
 John Dickson, The Christ Files: How Historians Know What They Know about Jesus, 2010.
 John 19:17.
 Barnabas 12:2.
 Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho 40
 Irenaeus, Against Heresies, ii24.4; newadvent.org/fathers/0103224.htm.
Hi Gary, this article really covers the issue of how Jesus was crucified in a thorough way. Thanks. It can be printed and copied to pass on to JWs with other material.
I think the main point the JWs make is that the cross is often treat as a sacrosanct symbol and as a magical charm by others and that it takes away from the dignity of the sacrifice.
Hard to argue that.
You don’t see holocaust survivors wearing a swastika around their neck.
Rather than waste time arguing murder weapon semantics with the JWs (which aren’t really THAT important… just as wondering if it was a beretta or colt that killed Bruce Wayne’s parents matters not)
Either way, I’m not comfortable on the veneration some give to the cross or tree or stake etc. Misses the weighty more important things. Whether that’s the JWs or the Catholics.
As horrific as were Jesus’ torture and crucifixion, his supreme agony took place in the Garden of Gethsemane where he took upon himself all the sins, crimes (except murder), diseases, and emotional hardships, etc., of all humanity, past, present and future, and atoned for all of us, thus introducing the law of mercy as an answer to the law of justice which demands that humans pay for their sins. With his atoning sacrifice, he conquered the permanence of death and damnation thus redeeming all of us if we accept his sacrifice and repent.
Hi Gary, I was doing some research concerning the actual object that Jesus was crucified on, when I stumbled on your explanation/ conclusion of the object that Jesus was actually crucified on. Going through your article where you took excerpts from John 20:25 and Mathew 27:37, I would say your conclusion is actually wrong especially the ones made from the Bible which is our main focus.
In John 20:25 Thomas actually stated in the beginning of his sentence that unless he sees the *nail* marks on his hands which obviously tells us that it was one nail that was driven into both hands 🙌 of Jesus and the second statements where you highlighted the plural nails Thomas was talking about both nails that was used on the hands and feet of Jesus Christ that was why the second mention of the nail was pluralized.
In Mathew 27:37 “Above his head they placed a sign that read, “This is Jesus of Nazareth, King of Israel.”” TPT. If his hands was nailed above his head and a placard placed above the hands it is only right and logical to still say it was placed above his head, this is not a concrete proof that his hands were not above his head.
The cross or the stake is not supposed to be our point of focus but if we have to talk about it especially with biblical references then we have to do it the right way.
The significance of Jesus being crucified on the cross or stake is that Jesus having died for our sins has become the only link that can bring us eternal life from our previous state of death. He became death (sin) so he could pay the price for the debt we owed, so we could have life in him. This is clearly stated in Rom 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God [that is, His remarkable, overwhelming gift of grace to believers] is eternal life in Christ Jesus …
Without believing in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus, we cannot receive the gift of life in Christ, we have no life. So our focus should center solely on Christ Jesus, who is the word of God and not the physical object that did not die for our sins. Thank you 🙏🏽
Thank you for your comment Miracle. Nail is singular because only one nail pierced one hand. When Thomas is talkin about both of Jesus’ hands, he uses the plural, nails. If His hands were nailed above His head, the sign would say, placed above hands because that would identify the sign’s position more precisely. The Irenaeus statement about the shape of the cross is a powerful argument for it being the traditional cross as well.